Sorry I just saw this, I have been busy. I have no problem with people hunting for free. What I would like you to understand is that people that pay me to hunt are helping to create habitat. I am in the process of trying to buy approximately 210 acres that will cost about a half a million dollars, If I am going to pay for that it needs to generate enough income to pay for it. Hopefully I can pay for that with corn, beans, wheat and cattle. Or maybe I can pay for it with corn, beans, wheat, cattle and pheasant hunting which would mean that there would be habitat for not just for pheasants but many kinds of wildlife and song birds, which do you think would be best? We just wrapped up hunting for this year and I explained to each group that because of general inflation and the increase in commodity prices that I would have to increase my rates if I was going to stay in the business. The general thought was that they wanted me to stay in the business even with a 25% increase. If I can get this land deal done I can create a little more habitat instead of wall to wall corn and beans. So Goose which do you think is best? Should I end the hunting, get rid of the habitat or continue to be in the pheasant hunting business?